Walter Benjamin’s 1936 essay entitled
‘The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction’ delves in depth into
the elusive concept that he refers to as the ‘Aura’ of artwork. The Aura is
best described as the authenticity and artistic integrity of a work of Art.
‘One
might subsume the eliminated element in the term “aura” and go on to say: that
which withers in the age of mechanical reproduction is the aura of the work of
art.’ (Benjamin, [1936] Chapter II) In the age of mechanical
reproduction, that authenticity is compromised because of its exposure to
foreign agents and processes. For example, if an Animator were to animate with
the use of traditional animation, there is nothing between himself and his
work. In terms of digital animation, a new and foreign agent is introduced
whether it be a drawing tablet, Cintiq etc., compromising the ‘Aura’ of the
artwork by reducing its authenticity and originality. Another example of the
degradation of Aura is mass reproduction; after the animator has finished his
work, even if it was created authentically, its Aura is still compromised because
it has been distributed to the masses. ‘By
making many reproductions it substitutes a plurality of copies for a unique
existence.’ (Benjamin, [1936]
Chapter II). ‘The work of art reproduced becomes the work
of art designed for reproducibility.’ (Benjamin, [1936] Chapter IV). The creative process
of the artist is no longer simply an expression of soul rather compromised by
the inevitability or reproduction. This changes the creative process and shifts
the Artists focus off of himself and towards his viewers.
Benjamin describes art as being received on two different
accounts, one with an emphasis on cult value and another on exhibition value. ‘One may assume that what mattered was their
existence, not their being on view.’ (Benjamin, [1936] Chapter V). Benjamin
describes cult value as a sacredness of art while exhibition value is the
opposite in that it has been created for exhibition specifically to be viewed
by the masses. Benjamin speaks of ‘Desire of contemporary masses to bring things
“closer” spatially and humanly.’ (Benjamin, [1936] Chapter III). Because the contemporary masses desire to be closer to the ‘Aura’ of artwork, ironically they accept it’s reproduction. However, if the reproduction depreciates the Aura, the masses are accepting a small fragment of the original artwork.
No comments:
Post a Comment